A newly filed putative class action in the Northern District of California takes aim at supplement maker Pharmavite LLC, placing the company’s marketing and labeling practices under the microscope. In Spencer et al v. Pharmavite LLC, filed May 29, 2026, the named plaintiffs appear to be pursuing claims on behalf of consumers who purchased Pharmavite products allegedly marketed in…
Continue Reading False Advertising Class Action Targets Pharmavite Over Supplement Marketing

A Massachusetts federal judge has allowed a multistate challenge against the federal government to continue, concluding at this early stage that the plaintiff states had already shown harm from the challenged federal actions. That ruling is important not because it resolves the merits, but because it clears one of the biggest threshold obstacles in public-law litigation: whether the states can…
Continue Reading Massachusetts Federal Judge Keeps Multistate DOJ Challenge Alive

In a market crowded with legal AI tools promising faster drafting, smarter research, and greater efficiency, Thelonious is tackling a different challenge: helping legal and policy professionals keep pace with […]
The post StartUp Corner: Thelonious – A human-verified intelligence and knowledge platform appeared first on Legal IT Insider.
Continue Reading StartUp Corner: Thelonious – A human-verified intelligence and knowledge platform

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s June 2, 2026 public order in IPR2026-00252 is brief but still worth attention for PTAB practitioners: the Director denied discretionary review, leaving the underlying Board action in place. In practical terms, the decision reinforces how difficult it remains to obtain Director intervention absent a clear policy issue, legal error, or case-specific circumstance warranting extraordinary…
Continue Reading PTAB Director Denies Discretionary Review in IPR2026-00252

The Eleventh Circuit’s May 28, 2026 opinion in No. 24-11688 is now available, but practitioners should note an immediate practical issue: the publicly available case details provided here do not include the substance of the court’s ruling, the claims at issue, or the panel’s reasoning. That means the key takeaway at this stage is less about the merits and more…
Continue Reading Eleventh Circuit Opinion in No. 24-11688: What Practitioners Should Watch

A few months ago, I wrote about the new partnership between Masters AI Legal, the newly launched division of The Masters Conference, and Cat Casey, founder of The TechnoCat, a consulting and speaking practice focused on legal AI, to produce a global conference series devoted to making legal professionals “genuinely fluent in AI.”
On June 17, legal…
Continue Reading ‘Less Hype, More Application’ Is the Promise of This June 17 Legal AI Conference, Live In L.A. Or Virtual

The U.S. Supreme Court has reaffirmed the Securities and Exchange Commission’s ability to seek disgorgement of ill-gotten gains in fraud cases, preserving a remedy that has long been central to the agency’s enforcement playbook. For securities litigators and compliance professionals, the ruling matters not just as a doctrinal win for the SEC, but as a practical confirmation that one of…
Continue Reading Supreme Court Preserves SEC Disgorgement in Fraud Enforcement

Another law firm sued for a data breach. This time it’s not the firm’s clients but a class action brought by those who had no relationship with the firm other than their personally identifiable information was in the firm’s files and was exposed. The risks and disruption from cybersecurity lapses by law firms are real and growing. Here’s my discussion…
Continue Reading The Wiley Rein Data Breach Lawsuit: Yet Another Cybersecurity Wake-Up Call