A coalition of nearly two dozen states has sued the Trump administration over its decision to scale back beneficial-ownership reporting requirements for companies, teeing up a closely watched fight over the limits of executive power and the future of anti-money-laundering enforcement. At issue is a federal reporting regime designed to require certain entities to disclose information about the real people…
Continue Reading States Challenge Rollback of Beneficial Ownership Reporting Rules

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to unwind a challenged settlement between the Justice Department and Texas, leaving in place an agreement that critics say effectively scrapped a federal immigration policy without going through the usual notice-and-comment rulemaking process. The order does not end the underlying fight, but it preserves the settlement while the litigation continues—a meaningful procedural win for…
Continue Reading Supreme Court Lets DOJ-Texas Deportation Deal Stand—for Now

Today’s legal landscape is being shaped by a cluster of significant developments across litigation, enforcement, criminal law, and legal policy. For attorneys and in-house teams, the takeaway is less about any single headline and more about the broader direction of risk: courts are continuing to define procedural and substantive limits, regulators are pressing aggressive enforcement theories, and policymakers are influencing…
Continue Reading Eight Legal Developments Shaping Litigation and Compliance on October 28, 2026

The SEC has brought an administrative enforcement action against registered investment adviser Zoe Financial, alleging the firm failed to adequately disclose conflicts of interest tied to its adviser referral program and its affiliated platform, Zoe Wealth. The case is another signal that the agency remains focused on how advisory firms and fintech platforms present compensation arrangements, affiliations, and incentives to…
Continue Reading SEC Targets Zoe Financial Over Alleged Referral-Program Conflicts

The Eleventh Circuit’s October 20, 2026 decision in docket No. 25-13551 offers a useful reminder that appellate outcomes often turn as much on procedural posture and standards of review as on the underlying merits. Although the caption provided here is simply “Opinion,” the court’s ruling appears to focus on how and when issues may properly be presented on appeal—and what…
Continue Reading Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Limits on Appellate Review in Opinion No. 25-13551

A federal judge in Washington has extended a court-ordered pause on redevelopment work at East Potomac Park’s public golf course, preserving the status quo while litigation over the project moves forward. The ruling by U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes prevents redevelopment activity from proceeding for now and requires advance notice before any irreversible changes are made to the property.

The…
Continue Reading Judge Keeps Redevelopment Freeze in Place at D.C.’s East Potomac Golf Course

The Ninth Circuit has declined to immediately stop California from counting roughly 20,000 disputed ballots that the U.S. Department of Justice contends may have been cast by noncitizens, preserving the status quo while the underlying dispute continues in federal district court. The ruling does not resolve the merits, but it is a significant procedural win for California election officials at…
Continue Reading Ninth Circuit Leaves California Ballot-Counting Fight in District Court

The Justice Department says it is bringing charges involving 48 noncitizens in election-related matters, a notable enforcement announcement that lands squarely in the increasingly contentious legal landscape surrounding election integrity. Although the public summary is brief, the messaging suggests a coordinated effort by DOJ leadership to emphasize criminal election enforcement well ahead of the November 2026 general election.

At a…
Continue Reading DOJ Highlights Charges Against 48 Noncitizens in Election-Related Cases

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a challenge to the federal government’s longstanding ban on home whiskey distilling, setting up a closely watched dispute over the reach of federal power in alcohol regulation and tax enforcement. The case arrives at the justices after lower courts reached conflicting conclusions on whether Congress can prohibit individuals from distilling spirits at…
Continue Reading Supreme Court to Review Federal Ban on Home Whiskey Distilling

The Eighth Circuit’s October 19, 2026 disposition in docket no. 26-1425 is expressly labeled a nonprecedential opinion, which immediately shapes how practitioners should read it. While the decision does not create binding circuit law in the same way a published opinion would, it still provides a useful window into how the court is handling the issues presented in this appeal…
Continue Reading Eighth Circuit Nonprecedential Opinion Offers Limited Guidance—but Important Procedural Signals

The U.S. Supreme Court has allowed New Hampshire to fully enforce its restriction on using student IDs for voting in the 2026 midterms, a significant emergency-docket ruling with immediate implications for election litigation nationwide. The order leaves in place the state’s voter-identification regime for this election cycle and reflects the Court’s continued reliance on the principle that courts generally should…
Continue Reading Supreme Court Clears New Hampshire to Enforce Student-ID Voting Restriction for 2026 Midterms

The Fourth Circuit’s filing in Nonprecedential Opinion, No. 25-2509, appears to be a nonprecedential disposition rather than a published opinion establishing binding circuit law. That matters immediately for practitioners: even without creating formal precedent, these rulings can still signal how a panel is approaching recurring procedural or merits issues and can offer useful guidance for litigants handling similar appeals.

Because…
Continue Reading Fourth Circuit Issues Nonprecedential Disposition in Appeal No. 25-2509

The U.S. Department of Justice has reportedly warned California election officials that they have 48 hours to review a federal list of alleged noncitizen voters or face possible legal action. The letters, sent to California Secretary of State Shirley Weber and Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder Dean Logan, appear to mark an unusually aggressive federal intervention in state election administration well…
Continue Reading DOJ Gives California 48 Hours on Alleged Noncitizen Voter List, Raising Stakes for 2026 Election Litigation